WPCON next to WPINC

[Nazgul]

We have WPINC defined, which points to wp-includes. It seems logical to also define a WPCON that points to wp-content.

[markjaquith]

Just for ease of use, right? User-definable wp-content directory would be a bit more complicated.

[Nazgul]

Indeed for ease of use and consistency.

(And it saves some effort if we do want to change the folder name in the future.)

[Otto42]

Would it make sense to have a WPADM as well?

[markjaquith]

Patch needs a refresh. Punting.

[Nazgul]

Patch refreshed

[markjaquith]

Nazgul, rss.php:645 -- you can't use a constant here (nor a variable, nor a function -- only hardcoded values)

[Nazgul]

I learn something new every day. :) re-refreshed patch added.

[DD32]

you can't use a constant here (nor a variable, nor a function -- only hardcoded values)

I guess thats because its a Default class variable?

If so, Nazgul, you should set the default base in the constructor rather than just hard coding it if your modifying them all.

[Nazgul]

With DD32's constructor suggestion

[darkdragon]

This will break the enhancement to change the location of wp-content. There really should be a decision on whether to allow for those folders to be moved and make every place handle it well.

I would say that this ticket should be closed to allow for that change or at least not as drastic in some areas as to prevent the ability to relocate the wp-content folder.

[Nazgul]

Closing due to lack of traction.